Tornado in Hutchinson

                  

     

                          A tornado touched down in Hutchinson on July 2015 and still knocks. 

                                               Hutchinson, your ride will be long.

COMMENTS- Video "The breakfast sucks"

                      

 

Newest comments first

 

HUTCHINSON SA 

Not only a pleading about well-proved harassment acts and obvious violations/abuses of all kinds was not allowed by the Great man during a pseudo-hearing at the afternoon, but the court did not take the necessary time to study the submitted documents before a “délibéré”. They opted, contrarily to the norms, to take the decision the same day of the pseudo-hearing which was held during afternoon together with plenty of others. They took maybe just a quick look during dining late at the evening at the end of all hearings and then they took a hasty decision which they announced early next morning!@#. Why that unprecedented rush!? Justice is rather what the judge ate for dinner. 

 

WTH is “délibéré”? Le "délibéré" est l'espace de temps au cours duquel les juges qui ont entendu les parties ou leurs mandataires à l'audience, se retirent, pour débattre collégialement des dispositions qui constitueront le jugement ou l'arrêt. Au cours du délibéré le juge qui a présidé l'audience et ses assesseurs échangent leurs avis après avoir examiné les pièces du dossier. Si les opinions exprimées sont contradictoires, le Président soumet la ou les questions litigieuses au vote. En cas de divergences, son opinion est prépondérante. La discussion terminée et les votes ayant été exprimés, il se désigne lui-même ou désigne l'un de ses assesseurs pour rédiger le projet de jugement qui sera ensuite dactylographié ou imprimé par le personnel du Greffe et sera soumis à sa signature. Dans les affaires délicates comportant un très grand nombre de pièces de procédure et de documents, le Président peut désigner un des assesseurs pour faire un rapport qui selon le cas peut être oral ou, plus rarement, écrit. Les juges peuvent ainsi se réunir plusieurs fois avant qu'une décision soit prise. 

 

Indeed, they ridiculed justice in all terms.

Claudine S  

Obviously, we are oppressed not only in the workplace, as we can't speak out, but also inside the courtroom in the hearing of such big statements, as we would get the risk to pay a fine by showing disrespect to the judicial authority. But a disrespect towards the victims who bring to justice legally various corporate offenses is not punishable.

Karen Saint-Denis 

Defamation (in bad faith) towards those who denounce harassment in workplace is permitted by allowing fake accusations of the harassers to be pronounced within the courtroom but the victim is muzzled for not making “defamation” referring to real harassment acts proved by a plenty of obvious evidences. Revealing the truth, uncovering lies, discussion on obvious evidences concerning harassment acts is prohibited even within the courtroom, it’s illicit according to the great man! Indeed, the labor courts serve for ridiculing the justice. What is the role of judge? To determine the facts of a case and resolve disputes…by simply putting a muzzle!**! When the “defamation approach” is adopted even by the justice itself for resolving a case in the court we have sadly reached a breaking point, we have indeed reached a drama.

C Chanel

Maybe at a certain time in his career the great man was asked “What do you want for not going to the court” and he replied “I want to become a judge” and he became a great one. Such growth excuses the approach of harassers “we need harassment in order to become directors”. If one does not choose the side of the oppressors they become unemployed.

Charlotte Aubin 

Indeed, great men as Pierre Bellaiche who refuse a debate within the courtroom by the opposing parties regarding harassment claims allow the truth to prevail and judge with knowledge. The judge’s main objective is to find out the truth investigating the case and a final decision is based on arguments made during the trial and examination of evidences LOL. The labor courts feed satire richly. Definitely, he becomes top reference.

COMMENTS- Video "Le savoir voler"

Newest comments first

 

Claudine S

It is also noteworthy that when the victim questioned Baptiste Voillequin about the nature of the results the technician referred to (since there was no document other than personal academic notes in the drawer), he replied "let it go, let it go, I can't talk about it". He could not talk about his violation, but he could say easily lies against the victim to the director and later (after two years!) in his testimony to HR which was submitted formally to the court! He could do easily defamation behind the victim’s back. Although the company never put the victim in confrontation with him regarding the false accusations this nasty person made, although the company never notified the victim about his lies and no photos of "results" have been presented as evidences, they had the audacity to submit those accusations formally to the court shocking the victim! Where those nonexistent “results” have been presented? Why they were not shown to the victim, why the victim was not questioned by HR in regards to those “findings”, why the “results” were not presented to the court as evidences? What Baptiste Voillequin took photos of? They could not present to the court photos of academic notes, eh? But they could submit to the court unfounded accusations when the victim had received no notification/remark by anyone including the petty manager Baptiste Voillequin. Once more, the role of the HR investigator was proved to be approver of lies. 

Later, they demonstrated again their audacity with their complaint concerning the video “le savoir voler”, accusing the commenters of lying! How petty are they! “Let it go, let it go”, but the video will stay to expose their ugliness. In the reality they are even more ridiculous than the video shows. Indeed, Hutchinson SA montre bien ce qui est zero. Boooo!!

Thierry Lisa

The entity with the “elements” is called Baptiste Voillequin.

HUTCHINSON SA 
Could you also please communicate “données de nature“ which will allow the identification of the entity which under the auspices of Hutchinson Group committed workplace invasion of privacy (search of an employee’s desk, locked drawer and personal items, taking photographs without the victim’s knowledge or consent)? Who is the entity with the “many elements” which violated the employee’s drawer searching for academic notes and later lied accusing other employees of being thieves and reported that he got non-existent “results”? Which is the entity which seeked to exploit the employee’s expertise for his own promotion? Who is the despotic and oppressive entity depicted in the CdR video with the loudspeaker who shouted to a newly hired employee for over thirty minutes because the latter copied him in an email instead of sending him a separate one in advance for asking his permission for getting in contact with their colleagues? Who is the entity who rebuked an employee for not going every while during the day to the far away location where her/his technician works with her/his personal car to check if the technician is doing his boring tasks or helps the others? Who is the entity which France needed so disparately and did not allow him to leave the country for studies or work? Which is the entity which is expert is saying lies making defamation against those who has oppressed?

Thierry Lisa 

The dérisoire should go for a new publication titled: “Contribution à l’histoire de la violation en France (1944-2017): dynamiques d’imbécillité et régimes de production de savoir”.
He has made many contributions in this regard which indeed generated knowledge. France did not let him leave the country to open his horizons and see the science in its real dimensions without frontiers so he was looking for its bigger picture in the foreign academic notes of the expert. Yes, France needs historians with blinders to innovate LOL

Sabine W 

What one can expect from a scientist? Especially from those who have proved that they have fear of scientific research and their knowledge and undertake PG to h i s t o r y to research the local institutes which conducted research! Only complexes, pettiness and jealousy towards engineers which leads to such violations and other reprehensible acts. But whatever they do to undermine the latter fails. They just open their pit. All time long inferiority complexes. Such dérisoires are of course incapable of generating knowledge, but only arouse disgust by their conduct.

HUTCHINSON SA 

It is true, Albert. The senior directors who believe those dérisoires are the dupes who have no academic degrees. Any talent that enters the company can not stay long unless they are empty-headed or lackey. Advice to qualified people who seek a job: Do not run to waste! Anywhere else might be better.

Albert Bernard

Let me add my testimony to the reprehensible conduct of such "dérisoires". If one is highly educated and enters the company as project manager/expert (cadre) will be oppressed a lot by such silly superiors who want to dominate and believe that they are the only ones who have the knowledge even if they do not have the basic understanding. Any scientific/technical interpretation of results, any analysis or idea that a new hired project manager has will be exploited by such petty "responsables" and presented to the higher boss wrongly as their own work. They try to take the credit and mislead their superiors in hierarchy informing them wrongly that hey told to their subordinates (experts) what to do or how to interpret the results when in reality the responsables know nothing. They ignore their high credentials, academic background and try to diminish them. They are all fearful bosses who want to show to their higher managers/directors that they are the only experts and all the newly hired are below them even when the latter are much more qualified holding heavier academic degrees and having professional experience. Their attitude is very provocative and an expert who enters the company gets much oppressed as such “seniors” do not pay them the respect they deserve. They have such complexes that they even want to control the changing of slides during the presentations of the new project managers/experts and have the habit to interrupt them during their speech to talk about things that the presenter is in the process of explaining and indeed in a better way. They endeavour in that ugly way to show that they know and impress the directors or visitors being disrespectful to their colleagues in charge who may know more.They want to steal their know-how and promote themselves.Their efforts to dominate stepping on and diminishing others is very disgusting.
The word “respect” stated as corporate value does not have any place. One needs to be empty-headed if they want to stay in the company for years. If one has credentials it is impossible to tolerate such shit-heads above them. The company simply can not work with smart people. That is the reason that the post of a project manager is always vacant while the potential victims who seek a job are many. Respect must be replaced by fear in that dump-company.

Ervan Fagot

There is an extension in their deplorable and laughable behaviour. Upon reading stolen notes they have various queries as they are unable to understand mechanics or they lack the notes of all lectures. So the drollery continues when upon their shameful violations they get back to make questions attempting to solve their queries from their reading, they search every day the “interesting office” for new documents or the “missing pieces/lecture notes” to steal. They even dare to advice the expert “You can bring to the work your documents, books and anything you read… give me anything you have from your academic studies to help me to build a team…it is safe here to bring your sources…”
If the company wants to keep and promote such silly employees of no integrity who aspire to climb up the ladder stepping on others then they need firstly to send them back to universities to acquire the knowledge they need and then to provide them a series of  trainings for developing (if possible) their interpersonal skills and ethos.  The path will be long and costly, the “unquality” things and the company’s commitment to them are what cost money.

C Chanel

Attention! Comme le dérisoire a été promu cette année à un directeur technique "il a encore plus d'éléments" et il peut violer nos maisons. Donc, armez bien vos propriétés et allumez vos caméras de surveillance! Hutchinson youtube blog mettra la vidéo en ligne toujours "pour le bénéfice de l’entreprise".

HUTCHINSON SA
On se demande aussi comment il est possible qu’une entreprise promeuve telles bêtes ou comment il est possible qu'il existe une telle entreprise merdique.

Karen Saint-Denis

Le dérisoire non seulement il n’a pas eu honte pour la violation qu'il a commis et ses mensonges (diffamation à d’autres), mais il a provoqué ensuite davantage l’experte qu’il avait volé en passant de son bureau et prononçant précisément des extrait des notes qu’il avait volé et en faisant le geste pouce en l'air (that is sHit on my head, yes sHit!). Comment est-il possible qu’une personne soit si imbécile?

HUTCHINSON SA 

Le type dérisoire de la vidéo "le savoir violer" disgracie la France et ses universités «qui ne l'ont pas laissé quitter le pays car ils avaient besoin de lui» LOL On peut bien comprendre que tous les Français qui travaillent à l'étranger ont quitté le pays car ils ne pouvaient pas tolérer telles personnes débiles.
La France ne t’a pas permis de partir à l'étranger pour une formation ou un emploi car tu nous fais s’esclaffer de rire, dérisoire?LOL Bien sûr, nous avons besoin de dérisoires comme toi pour nous faire rire. Tu as appris l'art de voler dans les universités françaises? Tu as même volé ton diplôme la nuit?
Restez à l'écoute de nouvelles vidéos.

COMMENTS- Video "Sexual Assoholement - Prix de l'Hu.Mour"

                                    This project is FUN!

                                              Folk, you are scientist, why you are s*head?

 
                                                                               

Newest comments first

HUTCHINSON SA 

Regarding the video Sexual Assholement which Hutchinson Group refers to their complaint insisting so much, the rape attempt committed by the CEO in the hotel was well known to the company. Indeed, many employees in USA and France got aware of that reprehensible offense which was communicated by the associates present in the USA meeting. The department manager, Natacha Carniol, even adviced the victim to denounce it in social media (this also consists a consent for the publication which renders their complaint null and void). The French associates present in the USA were all well informed about the CEO’s offense by the CEO himself. Despite the fact that the company was well aware of that offense, they dared to proceed to a complaint accusing our commenters and video uploaders for lying! They referred to every denounced offense -made in good faith - as being a lie attributing improper characterizations to the commenters who were not called to the court to defend themselves. “Le fait de dénoncer mensongèrement à l'autorité judiciaire ou administrative des faits constitutifs d'un crime ou d'un délit qui ont exposé les autorités judiciaires à d'inutiles recherches est puni de six mois d'emprisonnement et de 7,500€ d'amende“. Also, degradation of the profile of our channel and our licit works of mockery which are based on our fundamental freedoms, the denigration of our commenters who are accused of lying consists itself defamation (made in bad faith) punishable with 12,000€ fine. Besides, “le fait pour quiconque connaissant la preuve de l'innocence d'une personne de s'abstenir volontairement d'en apporter aussitôt le témoignage aux autorités judiciaires ou administratives est puni de trois ans d'emprisonnement et de 45,000€ d'amende ». Multiplying the above fines by the bonus x5 we reach 322,500€. So the total amount for their offenses raises to life imprisonment plus 132,5 years of imprisonment plus 31,412,500€ fine. 

Catherine Bernard 

Claudine well noted: “If they do not want women in work then place them in the armed forces to fight and let men in the corporate world!” According to penal code “Constitue un crime et est puni de la réclusion criminelle à perpétuité les actes commis en exécution d'un plan concerté à l'encontre d'un groupe dans le cadre d'une attaque généralisée ou systématique; les actes de ségrégation commis dans le cadre d'un régime d'oppression systématique et de domination d'un genre sur l’ autre et dans l'intention de maintenir ce régime ». Let me add an interesting bonus for Huetchienshonte. The penalties provided by the articles of the labour and penal code refer to a natural person. Taking into account the terms of the article 131-38 of the penal code «Le taux maximum de l'amende applicable aux personnes MORALES est égal au QUINTUPLE de celui prévu pour les personnes physiques par la loi qui réprime l'infraction» we must multiply the penalties stated so far by five. So those raise for Hutchinson Group to life plus 118 years imprisonment and 30,265,000 euro fine. Let’s not forget the x5 bonus for any further fine, please

 

C Chanel  

Donald Trump should also suggest that the number of pro in France could have been less “by giving people guns”. That way the victims could aim at their direction (themselves) and would have been “saved” from the traders.

C Chanel

Catherine, you need to specify the duration of your ride. During mine the other day which lasted for less than an hour I got only six and indeed one was by an old woman!

Catherine Bernard

So, adding indicatively 27 years imprisonment and 100 000 euro fine for the rape attempt and sexual assault, 20 years imprisonment and 3 000 000 euros fine for the human trafficking supported by the organized gang HCH the penalties raise totally to 118 years imprisonment and 6 053 000 euro fine. Questions: Do the pro gain more respect than the WOB by the MOB? Is there any woman in our society who gains respect? Please let us know in which sector, country, company/university she works or studies. I went for a bike ride the other day to enjoy the weather unaccompanied and I got nine thumbs up. Please let me know if there is anyone who has gotten more during such activity.

Karen Saint-Denis 

The entity which attempted to rape an employee in the hotel room being or playing the drunk is called Bob Hanson, the President/CEO of Hutchinson Sealing Systems, USA. Those are the CEOs of Hutchinson Group. Indeed, as it has been noted earlier he provoked the employee during the dinner as he kissed her on the cheek with force while she leaned backwards to avoid contact and whispered “we will do more later”. He also compared his height with hers in a “back to back” fashion approaching his ass to hers.
Selon le Code Pénal « Le viol est puni de quinze ans de réclusion criminelle. Les agressions sexuelles autres que le viol sont punies de cinq ans d'emprisonnement et de 75 000 euros d'amende. Le viol est puni de vingt ans de réclusion criminelle et les agressions sexuelles autres que le viol sont punies de sept ans d'emprisonnement et de 100 000 euros d'amende: lorsqu'il est commis par une personne qui abuse de l'autorité que lui confèrent ses fonctions; lorsqu'il est commis par plusieurs personnes agissant en qualité d'auteur ou de complice; lorsqu'il est commis par une personne agissant en état d'ivresse manifeste ou sous l'emprise manifeste de produits stupéfiants. La tentative des délits est punie des mêmes peines».
What he went to do to her room? He wanted to ask her to compare his height with hers in an horizontal fashion? How come and he got a room adjacent to hers? He was planning to enter her room from the balcony? Even the pro receptionist is called to act as accomplice. CEOs, CTOs or CTEs demonstrate globally their CTE.

HUTCHINSON SA

Could you please communicate “données de nature“ which will allow the identification of the entity depicted in the video “sexual assholement” which under the auspices of Hutchinson Group went to the hotel room of an employee and knocked her door persistently being ready to commit a crime indeed after having prior publicly insulted four employees many times? This is not just sexual harassment and according to the penal code "la tentative du délit est punie des mêmes peines que celles pour le viol".

 

C Chanel 

Karen, si c'est une injure raciste la peine encourue est de 6 mois de prison et de 22 500 € d'amende. Le quatre employés injuriés sont européens tendis que le BullyOrBastard est américain. C’est une injure raciste. Donc on doit corriger la peine pour l’injure publique qui s’elève à 270 000 € et six ans d’emprisonnement pour les quatre injuriés et pour les trois occasions. Donc en total la peine pour Huechienshonte s’elève à 1 993 000 € et 17ans d’emprisonnement. Le montant doit être réduit si trois employés sur quatre ont été payés parce qu'ils avaient plus de deux ans d'expérience en ayant accepté les valeurs de harcèlement. Ceux qui ont moins de deux ans d'expérience ne reçoivent jamais d'indemnités s'ils portent plainte soit à l'interne soit à l'externe.

 

Karen Saint-Denis

Comment est-il possible que le CEO qui ose injurier publiquement sans raison à la réception d'un hôtel plusieurs employés criant à eux "You are all ASSHOLES, you are ASSHOLE, you are ASSHOLE, you are ASSHOLE and you are ASSHOLE!!!!!!", "You are stupid, why you are stupid?" ou en s'adressant à un tiers il les injurie davantage "the are all stupid..." peut être insulté quand l'injure revient à lui comme huement? Un employé injurié porte plainte auprès des RH mais il n'obtient pas d'indemnités, il se plaint auprès du tribunal mais il n'obtient pas d'indemnités, il écrit son avis sur des médias sociaux mais la société paie les médias pour supprimer l'avis défavorable. Comment quelqu'un dans notre société peut trouver son droit et être indemnisé pour les dommages subis? La loi n'est applicable que seulement pour les entreprises lorsqu'elles osent se présenter comme victimes de ce qu'elles ont semé? Que faut-il faire afin de mettre fin au harcélement, à l'abus, à la provocation ou les violations par les entreprises envers ceux qui ont besoin de travailler pour vivre? Que faut-il faire afin de mettre fin au dommage subi par les employés précédents ou actuels? L'injure est punie par la loi. Elle peut être privée ou publique. L'injure publique est une injure pouvant être entendue ou lue par un public. Le fait qu'une injure ait été prononcée dans un lieu fermé n'en fait pas forcément une injure non publique. Ainsi, une injure criée dans une cour d'immeuble, parce qu'elle peut être entendue par tous les occupants (qui ne se connaissent pas forcément) et leurs invités, est une injure publique. L'injure publique est punissable par une amende de 12 000 €. Si cela s'est multipliée par quatre personnes injuriées (à une certaine occasion) la peine s'élève à 48 000 €. Pour trois occasions la peine s'élève à 144 000€. Quant à l'injure non publique elle est punie par une contravention de 38 € maximum. Si cela s'est multipliée par l'effectif de l'entreprise (par exemple 41 000) seulement pour une occasion la peine s'élève à 1 558 000 €. Donc en total la peine pour l'injure publique et non publique que Huechienshonte doit payer s'élève à 1 702 000 € et en ajoutant les pénalités susmentionnées le montant total pour Huechienhonte s'élève à 1 867 000€ et 11 ans d' emprisonnement. Mais les entreprises ne paient jamais, pas même un centime car la loi les toujours protège, seulement elles!

 

Thierry Lisa
An(e)ther B.O.B (Baby Of Business). We reply to LO.VE (LOathly VExing) by B.O.B (Bullies Or Bastards) with B.O.B (Bombs Over B.O.B).
  

Charlotte Aubin
When morons climb up the ladder they bring H.A.NSON (from Hell After hutchiNSON).

HUTCHINSON SA 
If the ass would break the door and get shot that element could be proved but since the door did not open it could not be used in the accusations. Also, grabbing an associate and kissing her in the cheeks during the dinner while she leans backwards to avoid contact and whispering in her ears “we will do more later” again can not be proved. The victim can be considered liar and the harassers get always the pleasure of making such an abuse of power provoking employees being protected by the nasty company. They are all inspired by the HR Hu.Mour from “HUMiliation” and “aMOUR”. This is an(e)ther worldwide Prix de l'Hu.Mour.

Catherine Bernard

Anether “fine” piece of Huechienshonte Worldwide. CEOs, CTOs or CTEs demonstate to us globally their CTE. They make the world shit.